NoteTaking

File size
8.1KB
Lines of code
252

NoteTaking

Tools for organizing thoughts.

Dendron

  • Open-source knowledge management tool integrated with VS Code
  • Hierarchical note organization with schemas and templates
  • Lightning fast and scalable for large knowledge bases
  • Supports daily journals, scratch notes, digital gardens
  • Pros
    • Developer-focused workflow within familiar VSCode environment
    • Hierarchical organization superior to flat structures
    • Active community of 30,000+ users
    • Excellent for restructuring knowledge over time
  • Cons
    • Requires VSCode, limiting non-developer adoption
    • Steeper learning curve for non-technical users
    • Less visual than dedicated note-taking apps

Obsidian

  • Private, local-first note-taking with bidirectional linking
  • Interactive graph view of note connections
  • Canvas feature for visual brainstorming
  • Thousands of community plugins and themes
  • Cross-platform with optional encrypted sync
  • Pros
    • Free core app without usage limits
    • Notes stored locally in markdown (no vendor lock-in)
    • Highly customizable via plugins
    • Strong community ecosystem
    • Publish feature converts notes to websites
  • Cons
    • Sync and publish features require paid subscriptions
    • Not fully open source (proprietary core)
    • Can become overwhelming with plugin options
    • Mobile apps less feature-complete

Logseq

  • Open-source, privacy-first knowledge management platform
  • Supports markdown and org-mode formats
  • Whiteboard feature for visual organization
  • Outliner-based approach with bidirectional links
  • AGPL-3.0 licensed
  • Pros
    • Fully open source (can self-host and audit)
    • Free across all platforms
    • Excellent for daily journaling workflow
    • Active community development
    • Local-first with optional sync
  • Cons
    • Outliner paradigm different from traditional notes
    • Less polished UI than commercial alternatives
    • Performance issues with large graphs
    • Mobile apps still maturing

Joplin

  • Open-source cross-platform note-taking app
  • Supports multimedia notes (images, videos, PDFs, audio)
  • Web clipper for saving pages and screenshots
  • End-to-end encryption (E2EE)
  • Syncs with Dropbox, OneDrive, Joplin Cloud
  • Pros
    • Completely open source with open format
    • Works on desktop, mobile, and terminal
    • Strong privacy focus (based in EU)
    • Extensive sync options
    • Plugin and theme support
  • Cons
    • UI less modern than competitors
    • No native bidirectional linking
    • Collaboration features limited without Joplin Cloud
    • Graph view not built-in

SiYuan

  • Privacy-first personal knowledge management system
  • Block-level editing with bidirectional links
  • Built-in database with relations and rollup
  • Spaced repetition flashcards
  • AI integration with OpenAI
  • Pros
    • Block-level granularity superior for organization
    • Completely local with offline support
    • End-to-end encrypted sync
    • Advanced database features
    • Mobile and Docker deployment options
  • Cons
    • Smaller community than major alternatives
    • Documentation primarily in Chinese
    • Steeper learning curve for block-based workflow
    • AI features require external API keys

Anytype

  • Open-source, local-first note-taking application
  • Object-based note-taking with templates
  • Local on-device encryption with P2P sharing
  • Graph visualization of connections
  • No-code customization
  • Pros
    • Works fully offline
    • Object-based approach highly structured
    • No technical knowledge required
    • Cross-platform (Linux, Windows, Mac, iOS, Android)
    • Shared workspaces for team collaboration
  • Cons
    • Relatively new with smaller ecosystem
    • Object paradigm has learning curve
    • Limited third-party integrations
    • Sync features still in development

Notesnook

  • Open-source, zero-knowledge encrypted note-taking
  • End-to-end encryption before leaving device
  • Bidirectional linking and rich editing
  • Web clipper and password-protected sharing
  • Cross-platform with app lock
  • Pros
    • Strongest privacy model (zero-knowledge)
    • Fully open source including sync server
    • Can self-host entire infrastructure
    • Free tier available
    • Straightforward interface
  • Cons
    • Premium features require subscription
    • Smaller plugin ecosystem
    • No local-only mode (requires account)
    • Fewer power-user features than alternatives

BookStack

  • Simple, free wiki software
  • Organized structure: books, chapters, pages
  • Markdown and WYSIWYG editing
  • Built-in diagram creation
  • Multi-factor authentication and role-based permissions
  • Pros
    • Completely free and MIT licensed
    • Excellent for team documentation
    • Simple, intuitive interface
    • Runs on minimal infrastructure ($5 VPS)
    • Multi-lingual support
  • Cons
    • Requires self-hosting (no cloud option)
    • MySQL dependency
    • No mobile apps (web-based only)
    • Limited personal knowledge management features
    • No bidirectional linking or graph view

More on